Skip to main content

City financier Amanda Staveley who is suing Barclays for up to £830m gave evidence that was 'plainly dishonest' and 'peppered with hyperbole', lawyer for bank tells High Court

A businesswoman suing Barclays for hundreds of millions of pounds gave evidence which in some respects was 'plainly dishonest' at a trial, a lawyer for the bank told a High Court judge.

Amanda Staveley claims Barclays agreed to provide an unsecured £2 billion loan to Qatari investors - but says the loan was 'concealed' from the market, shareholders and PCP Capital Partners, a private equity firm she runs.

She says PCP was induced to invest on 'manifestly worse terms' than Qatari Investors and but for Barclays' 'false representations' would have subscribed on 'vastly better terms'. 

Jeffery Onions QC told Mr Justice Waksman that during Ms Staveley's High Court questioning over the matter earlier in the year, she had a 'tendency to exaggerate'. 

He said her evidence had been 'peppered with hyperbole' and argued that the claim should be dismissed.

Amanda Staveley's firm PCP has reduced its damages claim against Barclays from £1.6 billion to £771 million after evidence was concluded in the case

Amanda Staveley's firm PCP has reduced its damages claim against Barclays from £1.6 billion to £771 million after evidence was concluded in the case

Mr Onions said 'contemporaneous documents' provided an insight into Ms Staveley's 'personality and modus operandi' - to 'duck and weave'.

Lawyers representing Ms Staveley told the judge that the claim was 'straightforward' and should succeed.

Ms Staveley has made complaints about the behaviour of Barclays' bosses, when negotiating investment deals during the 2008 financial crisis, and says she was given 'false representations'.

She claims the unsecured £2 billion loan was agreed on by Barclays, but was 'concealed' from the market, shareholders and PCP Capital Partners. 

Ms Staveley, who says PCP introduced Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour - a member of the royal family of Abu Dhabi, to Barclays as an investor - says PCP was induced to invest on 'manifestly worse terms' than Qatari investors.

The businesswoman has made complaints about the behaviour of Barclays' bosses when negotiating investment deals during the 2008 financial crisis

The businesswoman has made complaints about the behaviour of Barclays' bosses when negotiating investment deals during the 2008 financial crisis

She says but for Barclays' 'false representations' PCP would have subscribed on 'vastly better terms'.

Mr Justice Waksman heard evidence at a High Court trial in London during the summer.

Lawyers returned to court on Monday to begin making final legal arguments.

Mr Onions said PCP's original claim was for £1.6 billion but the firm's maximum claim was now for less than half that figure.

Lawyers representing PCP, and Ms Staveley, said the initial claim was for a maximum of £1.5 billion and a minimum of £400 million.

They now say they are arguing for amounts ranging between around £830 million and around £600 million, depending on experts' evaluations of loss.

Mr Onions told the judge, in a written submission, that Ms Staveley's evidence had 'evolved in critical respects'.

'Ms Staveley made no effort to be precise or stick to what she could actually recall, but had a tendency to exaggerate: her oral evidence was peppered with hyperbole,' he said.

'Some of this may be explained as honest mis-recollection or exaggeration.

'But in some respects her evidence was plainly dishonest.

He added: 'The contemporaneous documents also provided an insight into Ms Staveley's personality and modus operandi: to duck and weave, and say what needed to be said at any given moment to keep her show on the road.'

Mr Onions told the judge that PCP had given information about the amount for 'which it was now contending' in a letter after the trial ended in early August.

'When the trial started, the quantum of the claim, as widely reported in the press, was for £1.6 billion,' he said.

'No attempt was made to justify that claim.

'It was not until a letter dated August 19 2020, after the evidence was concluded, that PCP acknowledged that the maximum claim for which it was now contending was less than half that amount (£771 million).'

Joe Smouha QC, who leads PCP's legal team, said the building blocks of the claim were 'straightforward'.

Former Barclays boss Stephen JonesFormer Barclays executive Roger Jenkins

She says PCP was induced to invest on 'manifestly worse terms' than Qatari Investors and but for Barclays' 'false representations' would have subscribed on 'vastly better terms'. Left: Ex-Barclays boss Stephen Jones and ex-Barclays executive Roger Jenkins who both gave evidence 

He said PCP had been 'induced' to make subscriptions on the basis of 'representations' by Barclays which were 'false'.  

She says PCP was induced to invest on 'manifestly worse terms' than Qatari Investors and but for Barclays' 'false representations' would have subscribed on 'vastly better terms'.

PCP has sued the bank and wanted £1.6 billion in damages.

But lawyers representing Barclays told the judge overseeing the fight that the PCP is now making a 'maximum claim' for £771 million.

Mr Justice Waksman heard evidence at a High Court hearing in London during the summer.

Lawyers returned to court on Monday to begin making final legal submissions.

'When the trial started, the quantum of the claim, as widely reported in the press, was for £1.6 billion,' Jeffery Onions QC, who leads Barclays' legal team, told the judge in a written submission.

'No attempt was made to justify that claim. It was not until a letter dated 19 August 2020, after the evidence was concluded, that PCP acknowledged that the maximum claim for which it was now contending was less than half that amount (£771 million).'

Barclays say PCP's claim should be dismissed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The HS2 money pit: Ministers are told first stage of high-speed rail line may cost another £800m... six months after a budget increase saw total costs soar by £20.6bn to £43billion

Ministers have been told that Phase One of controversial rail line HS2 could cost £800million more than planned. It comes just six months after a budget increase saw total predicted costs for the first stage of the high-speed line soar by £20.6billion to £43billion. In a written statement to Parliament, HS2 Minister Andrew Stephenson said half of this figure is due to preparation of the route for construction involving 'more significant challenges than anticipated'. This includes the need to remove more asbestos than expected. Another 'significant cost pressure' worth £400 million has also been identified during the development of designs for Euston station. Mr Stephenson warned that further investigation is being carried out which 'could identify further pressure'. Ministers have been told that Phase One of controversial rail line HS2 could cost £800million more than planned. Pictured: HS2 Minister Andrew Stephenson The HS2 route would initially link London and...

EXCLUSIVE: From a $US13million mansion to a caravan: How the Australian wife of Il Divo singer has been 'forced' to live in a dodgy trailer park after a wildfire burned down their house during a bitter divorce battle

'Forced' into a 'mobile home park': Renee Izambard (nee Murphy) with her estranged husband, the suave Il Divo opera singer Sebastien Izambard An Il Divo opera singer's estranged Australian wife claims she was 'forced' to live in a caravan park after their $US12.95million Malibu mansion burned down in a wildfire days just after she filed for divorce.  Details of one-time Sydney Sony Music executive Renee Izambard's new life after her messy split with French tenor Sebastien Izambard were laid bare in a lawsuit filed with a Californian court this week. Ms Izambard (nee Murphy) is suing insurer State Farm, her estranged husband, an insurance agent and up to 20 others, over an allegedly 'inadequate' policy which covered the couple's destroyed former Malibu home.  Their five bedroom residence - described as a 'no expense spared ... oasis' - and its two guest houses went up in flames on November 8, 2018 during California's devastating Wo...

Missouri police resume search for body of mother, 28, believed to have been 'suffocated by her husband who wanted to stop her fleeing to her native China with their daughter' a year ago

A year after a young Chinese mother living in Missouri with her family vanished without a trace, police have resumed the search for her body.  Mengqi Ji Elledge, 28, was reported missing by her husband, Joseph Elledge, on October 10, 2019. He was charged in February with first-degree murder in her death and has pleaded not guilty. The couple has a young daughter together. Joseph has been accused of suffocating his wife to death and disposing of her body in order to prevent her from returning to her native China with their child and to avoid a costly divorce.    Police in Missouri are renewing their efforts to locate the body of Mengqi Ji Elledge, 28, who went missing last October and is presumed dead. Her husband, Joseph Elledge, was charged in February with first-degree murder in her death Police had searched for Mengqi's remains with divers, sonar and heavy machinery at the Lamine River near Booneville after cadaver dogs hit on a scent there Police had searched for her remains wi...